askew
Full Member
Posts: 6,774
|
Post by askew on Nov 12, 2024 22:58:22 GMT
Appears somebody has uploaded Alien Romulus to YouTube: had “Alien 2025 Action Movie | Best Action Movie 2024 Hollywood” appear in my recommendations.
|
|
|
Post by Leolian'sBro on Nov 12, 2024 23:46:26 GMT
Speak No Evil - James McAvoy has hit the gym HARD and hangs around the West Country being intimidating and overbearing to Scoot McNairy and his very British-sounding American wife. It’s good stuff, a very solid suspense thriller which reminds me of Funny Games and, like Funny Games, the original is the weirder and more intense version. Well worth a watch if you fancy a stressful couple of hours.
|
|
|
Post by lordofthedunce on Nov 13, 2024 10:15:02 GMT
Deadpool & Wolverine. 6.5/10 Some good chuckles but the set pieces weren't that fun or perhaps just didn't feel fresh anymore. Decent cameos. I think the story lacked heart and the setting was boring. The baddies were a bit forgettable.
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,831
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on Nov 13, 2024 10:49:07 GMT
Gladiator
First time seeing this in... about 20 years? Man, time flies.
It mostly holds up! The Commodus character really sucks all the energy out of the movie whenever he appears on screen, but aside from that the performances are solid, the action is good, and the CG bits don't stand out nearly as much as I thought they would.
It's pretty wild that it won Oscars; I don't think it's *that* good. But it's still a lot of fun, a good romp.
8/10
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,831
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on Nov 13, 2024 10:50:47 GMT
Oh, and I remember someone mentioning how similar the score is to Pirates of the Caribbean. They weren't lying; the main battle melody is basically identical, to the point of it actually being distracting. Hans Zimmer eh.
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Nov 13, 2024 13:04:07 GMT
Wasn't Commodus a really good baddie? I remember him being deeply hateable in a good way.
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,831
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on Nov 13, 2024 13:09:42 GMT
He's just so whiny and weird, and not in a particularly threatening way. But reasonable minds can differ, of course.
|
|
cubby
Full Member
doesn't get subtext
Posts: 6,334
|
Post by cubby on Nov 13, 2024 13:20:07 GMT
I thought he was a sap back then so can't imagine that's improved since.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Nov 13, 2024 13:21:30 GMT
Gladiator First time seeing this in... about 20 years? Man, time flies. It mostly holds up! The Commodus character really sucks all the energy out of the movie whenever he appears on screen, but aside from that the performances are solid, the action is good, and the CG bits don't stand out nearly as much as I thought they would. It's pretty wild that it won Oscars; I don't think it's *that* good. But it's still a lot of fun, a good romp. 8/10 I don't think it's that wild that it won Oscars. Not in the slightest. It's a swords and sandals epic of that kind that hadn't been done for a while, great sets, costumes and it has great visual design with an enormous sense of scale to it. Best actor is debatable but playing down it's Oscar worth when you have to view it through the lens of the Academy at the time and what was being released in cinemas it makes perfect sense.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 13, 2024 14:58:58 GMT
Deadpool & Wolverine (disney+) More story and character content than I expected, some nice cameos but the action sequences were only so so. It was funnier than I expected too but then I did go in slightly worried it would be a Family Guy style pile-up of references and memes.
Down Terrace (all4) Ben Wheatley’s zero budget (£30k!) debut feature. Mix of black comedy and kitchen sink drama about a crime family with a strong cast. Considering its limitations it manages to hint at things he’ll keep doing down the line.
I watched Kill List straight after finishing Gen Z which inspired me to go through his other indie films. I like that if I had done them all in order instead of Kill List first its a perfect bridge from the kitchen sink of Down Terrace to the trippier stuff that comes after.
Sightseers (all4) It gets included in the “one for him”/auteur lists for Wheatley but its an Alice Lowe and Steve Oran script. Stylistically it plays to all of Wheatley’s strengths. The naturalistic shooting style for comedy and drama plays well and then the hints of horror and psychedelia bleed through the cracks to give it a lot of atmosphere. Cracking soundtrack too. Probably the most accessible film among these and the best British film of its type since Shaun of the Dead.
A Field In England (all4) Probably the least accessible of his films but I think its astonishing. Obviously all the artwork has become iconic but rewatching again without distractions there are some stunning scenes. It feels like you could read the film a different time with every viewing and always be correct.
Happy New Year, Colin Burstead (iplayer) Highly underrated and under seen film. Breaks away from the established ensemble he uses for most of his films and instead its an all star cast. Its also a return to very naturalistic drama, although now Wheatley is using skills learned doing horror to up the tension. Clint Mansell is on board doing the score now too which feels like an inevitable and entirely appropriate coming together.
I think because he’s so associated with horror/folk-horror Wheatley’s talent for shooting realism and drama goes hugely unremarked upon but even in films like Kill List it forms the bulk of screen time. This film feels very much like the kind of European independent production I used to go to see at the art house cinema in town before I had a kid and couldn’t go anymore. Its very very good.
In The Earth Its the most conventional of these films promising a modern pandemic set folk-horror and then delivering exactly that. I can’t really criticise it much because every part of it seems to be doing just what it was meant to and every actor is doing there bit.
It does feel a but safe though. I assume that’s partly because as well as being set during covid, it was also made during covid. So it feels quite small in its execution and scope - even compared to above where two films are set in single buildings another in one field. It might just be a me thing but in the film they talk about being 30 miles from civilisation but it feels very much like they’re in a municipal woodland park and that there’s probably a visitor centre just out of shot.
So yeah, turns out I do still think all of Ben Wheatley’s films are very good. I mention SOTD above, I think I’ve argued in the past that Edgar Wright is the most important British director of the millennium so far because of the door he opened for things that weren’t sweet romcoms, cheap horror or Danny Boyle films to be made. I wonder if there might be a case for Wheatley being his heir in terms of creating extremely cine-literate but genre bending films (that are actually good).
TLDR watch Happy New Year Colin Burstead, I know you haven’t seen it yet.
|
|
rawshark
Full Member
Posts: 5,162
Member is Online
|
Post by rawshark on Nov 13, 2024 15:13:53 GMT
I have seen HNY,CB. But as is often the case I was probably four pints in and half asleep so can remember very little about it. Definitely needs a rewatch.
|
|
|
Post by britesparc on Nov 13, 2024 15:45:56 GMT
Gladiator First time seeing this in... about 20 years? Man, time flies. It mostly holds up! The Commodus character really sucks all the energy out of the movie whenever he appears on screen, but aside from that the performances are solid, the action is good, and the CG bits don't stand out nearly as much as I thought they would. It's pretty wild that it won Oscars; I don't think it's *that* good. But it's still a lot of fun, a good romp. 8/10 I don't think it's that wild that it won Oscars. Not in the slightest. It's a swords and sandals epic of that kind that hadn't been done for a while, great sets, costumes and it has great visual design with an enormous sense of scale to it. Best actor is debatable but playing down it's Oscar worth when you have to view it through the lens of the Academy at the time and what was being released in cinemas it makes perfect sense. I literally walked out the cinema in 2000 and said "well, it's not going to win any Oscars but it was really fun!" I think the feeling was Crowe got one of those "probably should have won last year" awards after losing out for The Insider. Although Maximus is a great role in a very specific type of film, one the Academy don't award very often.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Nov 13, 2024 16:11:41 GMT
Perhaps but the majority of Oscars that it won were production related which I think is fair enough for the time.
|
|
|
Post by britesparc on Nov 13, 2024 18:11:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by retro74 on Nov 13, 2024 18:32:37 GMT
I’ve seen him mentioned a few times on this thread - Ben Wheatley - I’ve never heard of him and having looked him up I’ve never seen any of his films either
The only one I’ve ever heard of is The Meg 2 and I’m just not prepared to watch that
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Nov 13, 2024 18:49:01 GMT
Don't it's pretty bad. The first one had a campness i could kind of get aboard with the sequel is just straight up bad.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 13, 2024 18:49:43 GMT
For some reason I thought Chocolat had won and Gladiator and Brockovich got the acting awards
|
|
|
Post by retro74 on Nov 13, 2024 19:15:40 GMT
Don't it's pretty bad. The first one had a campness i could kind of get aboard with the sequel is just straight up bad. I’ve seen the first one and thought it was pretty bad so there’s no way I’m watching a sequel that’s even worse
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Nov 13, 2024 20:28:54 GMT
I love Gladiator. In my mind there’s nothing wrong with it in any way at all and I wont hear a word against it.
|
|
|
Post by Dougs on Nov 13, 2024 20:31:55 GMT
Watched it the other week, it's still great. Perhaps not as great as when I first watched it perhaps but very decent.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 13, 2024 20:37:05 GMT
Don't it's pretty bad. The first one had a campness i could kind of get aboard with the sequel is just straight up bad. I’ve seen the first one and thought it was pretty bad so there’s no way I’m watching a sequel that’s even worse I think that’s just how he gets the pocket money he uses to run around the woods playing Wicker Man with his friends
|
|
rawshark
Full Member
Posts: 5,162
Member is Online
|
Post by rawshark on Nov 13, 2024 21:19:39 GMT
It’s definitely an anomaly in his portfolio. It came up in his interview with Simon Mayo for Gen Z.
|
|
Tomo
Junior Member
Posts: 3,451
|
Post by Tomo on Nov 14, 2024 14:34:31 GMT
Small Things Like These - 8/10
Slight and harrowing portrayal of historical child abuse in Irish convents. Lots of extreme close-ups of a very traumatised Cillian Murphy. Beautifully shot. Perhaps not the best choice of film to see at 1045, although there was a surprising amount of other people in the showing. Really peps you up for the day.
|
|
|
Post by simple on Nov 14, 2024 14:39:09 GMT
And that’s what the Blink 182 song is about?!
|
|
askew
Full Member
Posts: 6,774
|
Post by askew on Nov 14, 2024 23:02:54 GMT
Ronin - 7/10
They don't make 'em like this any more. Car chases in Paris obviously inspired Bourne Identity and later Mission Impossible 5/6(?)
|
|
MolarAm🔵
Full Member
Bad at games
Posts: 6,831
|
Post by MolarAm🔵 on Nov 15, 2024 10:44:46 GMT
Glad2ator
It wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. Denzel was good, Pedro Pascal was good, Connie Nielsen was good, the emperor twins were more fun as villains than Joaquin was, a couple of the action scenes were good.
But it was still pretty bad. Bad script, bad dumb plot that didn't make much sense. And Paul Mescal is no Rusty Crowe. He's doing his best, but there's very little charisma, and he only gets to deliver lines from the aforementioned bad script.
I was entertained, but not nearly as much as I was by the first one.
6/10
|
|
|
Post by britesparc on Nov 15, 2024 14:22:31 GMT
Shazam! Fury of the Gods (2023) **A lot of the fun tone seems to have gone out of this film. I don't know if it's my opinion of Levy souring since the first film, but his Shazam feels a lot less like Big-but-a-superhero and more of a weird, whiny man-child. The two actors playing Freddy Freeman fare much better, especially in the rather sweet if fast-paced romance with Rachel Zegler. Beyond that, it's pretty much supes-by-numbers. It's fine, it's inoffensive, you might have fun, but it's a bit of a nothing. Also: the only thing that disappoints me about the semi-reboot of DC continuity is it almost certainly means we're not going to get a third Shazam film where Mark Strong has to team up with a talking caterpillar. And that is a travesty. (Sky) The Wild Robot (2024) *****DreamWorks are on a roll aren't they? This is another inventive and inspired animated film, even if its core message isn't exactly brand new. However, the whole fish-out-of-water/Iron Giant thing does feel a bit different when filtered, essentially, through the lens of motherhood. All the characters are pretty good, it's well-voiced, it's suitably emotional without feeling cloying or sentimental, it's exciting, but above all it's beautiful. The CG has a kind of soft watercolour sheen, presumably evoking the book it's based on, which is really interesting. And the use of colour, shape, and overall design is really strong. Probably my favourite animation of the year. (Cinema)
|
|
|
Post by Wizzard_Ook on Nov 15, 2024 16:16:35 GMT
Glad2ator It wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. Denzel was good, Pedro Pascal was good, Connie Nielsen was good, the emperor twins were more fun as villains than Joaquin was, a couple of the action scenes were good. But it was still pretty bad. Bad script, bad dumb plot that didn't make much sense. And Paul Mescal is no Rusty Crowe. He's doing his best, but there's very little charisma, and he only gets to deliver lines from the aforementioned bad script. I was entertained, but not nearly as much as I was by the first one. 6/10 I havn’t been to the cinema in years, been itching to go for a while so might check it out this weekend. Need to carve out a spot from my non existent diary with no plans scheduled to fit it in. I do kinda want to see Nick Cave’s version. Just listened to the kermode & mayo podcast. It sounds pretty wild.
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Nov 15, 2024 16:23:11 GMT
Glad2ator It wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. Denzel was good, Pedro Pascal was good, Connie Nielsen was good, the emperor twins were more fun as villains than Joaquin was, a couple of the action scenes were good. But it was still pretty bad. Bad script, bad dumb plot that didn't make much sense. And Paul Mescal is no Rusty Crowe. He's doing his best, but there's very little charisma, and he only gets to deliver lines from the aforementioned bad script. I was entertained, but not nearly as much as I was by the first one. 6/10 Seeing this tomorrow so I guess we'll see.
|
|
mikeck
Junior Member
Posts: 1,916
Member is Online
|
Post by mikeck on Nov 15, 2024 17:38:49 GMT
Speak no Evil (2022)Fucking hell, that was fucking bleak. I know it's in keeping with the point of the film, but the fact the parents didn't fight back just annoyed me to no end. I really had to suspend belief that they wouldn't have put up some kind of struggle. If I was in that situation and witnessed that happening to my daughter there is no way I wouldn't try to inflict some damage. Again, I understand the director's intention with this choice, but so hard to reconcile for me. That being said, it was a very good film, but not one I'd ever re-watch. I do want to wwatch the remake though only because it is less BLEAK
|
|