|
|
Post by Vandelay on Aug 14, 2024 8:52:13 GMT
What's with the * at the end of the title?
|
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Aug 14, 2024 9:26:02 GMT
They haven’t said but I guarantee it will turn out to be underwhelming.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 14, 2024 9:26:19 GMT
What's with the * at the end of the title? I think they said it would be revealed in the movie. |
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Aug 14, 2024 9:34:33 GMT
Some people I like team up with some people I don't care about. :thumbsup:
|
|
|
|
Post by britesparc on Aug 14, 2024 9:46:37 GMT
I'm baffled by the asterisk, because does it mean they're going to change the title after everyone's watched it?*
*Two days after it comes out, which seems to be Disney's formal timeframe for revealing huge spoilers.
|
|
|
|
Post by baihu1983 on Aug 14, 2024 10:29:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 14, 2024 10:33:17 GMT
HEY LOOK GUYS WE HAVE BLOOD AND STUFF, ISN'T THAT REALLY COOL!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 14, 2024 10:33:58 GMT
Also lol at that actually being the Rhino.
|
|
|
|
Post by baihu1983 on Aug 14, 2024 10:37:53 GMT
I was sort of on board with it till he showed up.
|
|
apollo
Junior Member
Posts: 1,712
|
Post by apollo on Aug 14, 2024 10:52:54 GMT
looks shit, they should do Morbuis, madam web and kraven team up movie as it will so bad,
|
|
|
|
Post by starchildhypocrethes on Aug 14, 2024 11:39:47 GMT
I have absolutely no idea what a Kraven is. Is he just a budget Wolverine?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Aug 14, 2024 12:14:25 GMT
Hey look, it's James Bond!
Unless Kraven is so bad it tanks his chances
|
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 14, 2024 12:24:21 GMT
I have absolutely no idea what a Kraven is. Is he just a budget Wolverine? He's a spiderman villain. Who hunts great prey. Most notably spiderman. Who isn't in this movie because Sony don't know what they're doing and are just continually making films to keep the IP. |
|
|
|
Post by baihu1983 on Aug 14, 2024 12:29:34 GMT
Are they still desperately trying to do the Sinister Six?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 14, 2024 12:32:56 GMT
I would love to see them try just to see how shit it was and again to have a film where spiderman is not involved.
|
|
Bongo Heracles
Junior Member
Technically illegal to ride on public land
Posts: 4,633
|
Post by Bongo Heracles on Aug 14, 2024 12:41:26 GMT
This surely has to be the last one of these (venom notwithstanding)
|
|
|
|
Post by Whizzo on Aug 14, 2024 12:52:39 GMT
Lord & Miller are being given a lot more control over SPUMC (or whatever Sony are calling it at the moment) so hopefully they can use their magic to right the ship once Kraven and the "last" Venom are out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 14, 2024 13:10:02 GMT
This surely has to be the last one of these (venom notwithstanding) I doubt it. That endeavour to make a film out of a character who appeared in one issue of spiderman and make it a vehicle for the singer/rapper Bad Bunny should inform me you that barrel can still be scraped. |
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Aug 14, 2024 13:15:17 GMT
I feel like they need another Spiderman in the mix. If Tom Holland is mainly busy with MCU related stuff, then why don't they introduce a live action Miles and have him show up in most of these non-MCU movies. The whole concept of the Multiverse/Spiderverse is well known enough now that people would accept it. Then they could have the Miles one and the MCU/Holland one team up occasionally for big special events, like they do with Doctor Who. I mean, I'm sure they'll get around to it at some point, and maybe that's what they were hoping to set in motion with Madame Web, but it'd have made all these Villain-centric movies more compelling if they'd had a spiderman pop up in them, even if only in a limited way.
PS/ It seems like a major missed opportunity if the last Venom movie ends without him ever meeting Spider-man.
|
|
Derblington
Junior Member
Did you know I have a girlfriend
Posts: 2,133
|
Post by Derblington on Aug 14, 2024 13:39:53 GMT
Alternatively, just leave the live action stuff to Marvel, as Sony are just worse at it (even given the current state of the MCU), and Let Sony work on animated stuff under Lord and Miller as it's a proven thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 14, 2024 13:46:24 GMT
I feel like they need another Spiderman in the mix. If Tom Holland is mainly busy with MCU related stuff, then why don't they introduce a live action Miles and have him show up in most of these non-MCU movies. The whole concept of the Multiverse/Spiderverse is well known enough now that people would accept it. Then they could have the Miles one and the MCU/Holland one team up occasionally for big special events, like they do with Doctor Who. I mean, I'm sure they'll get around to it at some point, and maybe that's what they were hoping to set in motion with Madame Web, but it'd have made all these Villain-centric movies more compelling if they'd had a spiderman pop up in them, even if only in a limited way.
PS/ It seems like a major missed opportunity if the last Venom movie ends without him ever meeting Spider-man.
Because they know they can't make spiderman movies for shit and it's their golden goose they can't afford to fuck those up. In addition having spiderman in the wider MCU has proved to be far more beneficial than keeping the character in their own shitty Sony world. |
|
|
|
Post by Bill in the rain on Aug 14, 2024 13:53:15 GMT
But that's why they need a B-spiderman to keep their shitty sony world together.
|
|
Derblington
Junior Member
Did you know I have a girlfriend
Posts: 2,133
|
Post by Derblington on Aug 14, 2024 14:16:33 GMT
I think it just serves to further confuse everything. I don't think Sony have a clean way of making Spider-Man movies anymore, and with him still attached to the MCU looking at a new trilogy, there are likely stipulations between companies to not muddy the waters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 14, 2024 14:26:47 GMT
But that's why they need a B-spiderman to keep their shitty sony world together. I think Miles is actually more popular than OG spiderman at this point. |
|
|
|
Post by Reviewer on Aug 14, 2024 14:31:24 GMT
Not with racists.
|
|
|
|
Post by drhickman1983 on Aug 14, 2024 14:38:58 GMT
I think they're both pretty popular to be honest, I wouldn't want to say who is more popular. But I've seen fair arguments that Miles's more recent comic stories have been generally better than Peter's.
Miles is probably the only good thing to originate in the edgelord Ultimate series.
|
|
|
|
Post by rhaegyr on Aug 14, 2024 14:39:30 GMT
But that's why they need a B-spiderman to keep their shitty sony world together. I think Miles is actually more popular than OG spiderman at this point. Miles is really popular but I doubt he's more popular than Peter Parker - guy's iconic. |
|
|
|
Post by Vandelay on Aug 14, 2024 14:44:39 GMT
Yeah, not even close, judging by box office. Over 1.9 billion for No Way Home and 690 million for Enter the Spider-verse. Almost 3 times the amount (1 times for each Spider-Man).
|
|
|
|
Post by drhickman1983 on Aug 14, 2024 14:48:48 GMT
That could be down to one being an animation though, which will never have the same mass appeal live action films do (even if the live action films are basically animated themselves with all the VFX)
|
|
|
|
Post by Jambowayoh on Aug 14, 2024 14:49:12 GMT
Yeah, not even close, judging by box office. Over 1.9 billion for No Way Home and 690 million for Enter the Spider-verse. Almost 3 times the amount (1 times for each Spider-Man). I think it's not quite fair to compare a live action movie to an animated movie especially one with way more marketingand fanfare. I think a live action Miles movie would greatly surpass a Peter Parker one in popularity, especially in younger people. |
|
